JJ Colony: New Delhi: 2013
A young girl rests from the 45°C heat in a hut at the JJ Colony Slum on the edge of New Delhi. Her entire family were moved here as part of the Delhi City Beautification Process, a process that has left many homeless and jobless and pushed the poorest people out of the city to the edge of the city state.
Check Out: Fifteen Years of Human Rights Photography
Dear Friends,
I’m thrilled to announce that the Open Society Foundations are making available to the public an expansive documentary photography collection chronicling some of the most pressing human rights and social issues of our times.
Click here to view the new Moving Walls website.
© Katharina Hesse
The website houses a searchable archive of our Moving Walls exhibition series, which provides evidence of human rights abuses, puts a human face to conflict, and documents the struggles and defiance of marginalized people. The series has included more than 170 photographers over a span of 15 years.
Check out the new website and the latest exhibit, Moving Walls 20, and tell us what you think.
Sincerely,
Amy Yenkin
Director, Documentary Photography Project
@AmyYenkin
New Firefly NGO Video - Nazdeek:
Harrowing Testimony Documenting Brutal Beating of Woman by Delhi Police: Time to Demand More
Hear directly from community members and activists on the brutal beating of three innocent civilians, including one woman, by the Delhi police in a jhuggi cluster in Baljeet Nagar, Delhi. Bite marks, a fractured foot, and, intensive chest beatings caused severe harm, with Preeti, a mother of 3, rendered temporarily unconscious, and left to suffer seizures, shortness of breath, and intense chest pain several days after the violent incident.
Please share the video and join the fight to end police brutality. Together we’ll be working with the Baljeet Nagar community to demand a more accountable, gender-sensitive police force.
Pic from a project I’m currently working on, used for a story in The Hindu paper:
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/unsettlement-colony/article4612828.ece
A mother and daughter pose in their home at JJ Colony in Bawana. Part of my on-going project on slum resettlements in Delhi.
Some faces from Holi 2013 in New Delhi
Nothing like a car exploding right outside your house to keep you on your toes
Got a photo story up on Vice on Rahat Open Surgery in New Delhi.
Delhi Ambulance Drivers
Rapes and the Indian Justice System: An experimental data visualisation
Attended Hack/hackers Delhi this week, heres a write up by Pierre Mario Fitter on what
we created:
This weekend, I attended an excellent big data visualisation workshop organised by Hacks/Hackers Delhi. The idea was to get journalists and techies to collaborate on investigative, data-driven stories and tell them in intuitive ways. Numbers dull the reader’s mind. A well-designed infographic can convey complex ideas in a single frame.
The group I was a part of included journalists Nasr ul Hadi, Rajan Zaveri, Aayush Soni and my colleague at ITG Rohan Venkat. Our ‘techies’, who did much of the heavy lifting, were Piyush Kumar and Konark Modi. We were also joined by Yuan Lei, a journalism student from Shantou University in Guangdong. Since it’s been such an important story in recent weeks, we looked at how rape cases in India are treated by ‘the system’.
Before I get to our findings, I want to add a short note. We had just three hours to find data, organise it, clean it, ‘query’ it, and generate the visualisations. Not a lot of time. I’m sure a team working with more resources (particularly time) will draw more impactful conclusions. Our intention - since this was not a formal editorial process - was to start the conversation. We focused on three questions based on the data we had immediately available.
1. Adjusted for population, which states have the highest incidence of rape?
For brevity’s sake, we called this ‘rape probability’. In other words, how many rapes per thousand people. (Total reported rape cases/ State’s Population x 1000).
Some states such as Mizoram appear to have an unusually high ‘rape probability’. This may simply be because more rapes are reported, and not necessarily because women are more at risk. The national average was about 0.03 rapes per 1000 people.
2. If a rape case is reported in a state, how often does it result in a formal chargesheet?
We called this ‘chargesheet probability’. (Number of cases where charges are framed / Total reported cases x 100).
The clear outlier here is Manipur with just 9% of reported rapes ending in chargesheets. Is that only because of AFSPA? We cannot draw that conclusion until we know who the suspects are in each reported case. I also noticed an oddity. Three states - Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Tripura and Goa - have ‘chargesheet probabilities’ higher than 100%. We didn’t have time to find out why, so if someone out there could help in explaining that, I’d be grateful. The national average here was about 80%.
3. Finally, of the total reported cases, how many result in convictions?
We called this ‘conviction probability’. (No. of cases ending in convictions / No. of reported rapes x 100).
The outliers here are Nagaland and Sikkim with convictions secured in nearly 70% of cases that went to trial. Kerala was personally surprising with just a 2.7% conviction rate. The national average was about 18%.
Data sources: 2011 National Crime Records Bureau, National Census data
P.s. Even though we had the data, Google Fusion Tables would not generate visualisations for Jammu and Kashmir. It automatically marked the territory as ‘disputed’. Oddly, while it marks Arunachal Pradesh with similar diagonal lines, we still get the data represented on a map. I have contacted the Help Team about this and will post an update if I get a reply.
P.P.S Several states and U.Ts would show zero in their data fields. That’s mostly because data was either unavailable or could not be reliably ‘cleaned’.
The group I was a part of included journalists Nasr ul Hadi, Rajan Zaveri, Aayush Soni and my colleague at ITG Rohan Venkat. Our ‘techies’, who did much of the heavy lifting, were Piyush Kumar and Konark Modi. We were also joined by Yuan Lei, a journalism student from Shantou University in Guangdong. Since it’s been such an important story in recent weeks, we looked at how rape cases in India are treated by ‘the system’.
Before I get to our findings, I want to add a short note. We had just three hours to find data, organise it, clean it, ‘query’ it, and generate the visualisations. Not a lot of time. I’m sure a team working with more resources (particularly time) will draw more impactful conclusions. Our intention - since this was not a formal editorial process - was to start the conversation. We focused on three questions based on the data we had immediately available.
1. Adjusted for population, which states have the highest incidence of rape?
For brevity’s sake, we called this ‘rape probability’. In other words, how many rapes per thousand people. (Total reported rape cases/ State’s Population x 1000).
Some states such as Mizoram appear to have an unusually high ‘rape probability’. This may simply be because more rapes are reported, and not necessarily because women are more at risk. The national average was about 0.03 rapes per 1000 people.
2. If a rape case is reported in a state, how often does it result in a formal chargesheet?
We called this ‘chargesheet probability’. (Number of cases where charges are framed / Total reported cases x 100).
The clear outlier here is Manipur with just 9% of reported rapes ending in chargesheets. Is that only because of AFSPA? We cannot draw that conclusion until we know who the suspects are in each reported case. I also noticed an oddity. Three states - Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Tripura and Goa - have ‘chargesheet probabilities’ higher than 100%. We didn’t have time to find out why, so if someone out there could help in explaining that, I’d be grateful. The national average here was about 80%.
3. Finally, of the total reported cases, how many result in convictions?
We called this ‘conviction probability’. (No. of cases ending in convictions / No. of reported rapes x 100).
The outliers here are Nagaland and Sikkim with convictions secured in nearly 70% of cases that went to trial. Kerala was personally surprising with just a 2.7% conviction rate. The national average was about 18%.
Data sources: 2011 National Crime Records Bureau, National Census data
P.s. Even though we had the data, Google Fusion Tables would not generate visualisations for Jammu and Kashmir. It automatically marked the territory as ‘disputed’. Oddly, while it marks Arunachal Pradesh with similar diagonal lines, we still get the data represented on a map. I have contacted the Help Team about this and will post an update if I get a reply.
P.P.S Several states and U.Ts would show zero in their data fields. That’s mostly because data was either unavailable or could not be reliably ‘cleaned’.
Page 1 of 4
